perception of how childhood traumas T engo first to thank you for your comment, to Lucas Hidalgo has been the genesis of this intro. With these actions, the fact that shades you with a comment or contribute an idea, a new entry, a reflection, or even (not so popular around here) a new idea in theory, make you see met and shared objective of the creation of that page. all know now where to look for books, which make a run, which do an MA even where to write a book. But science, theories must continue to grow, and today the only science that is done is the experimental and coorelacional. We have forgotten how science emerged. Arose from the speculation , and very sinister you hear the word has no connotative meaning, and so began the philosophers (Plato, Aristotle, Descartes). None of them had a laboratory, nor statistical packages (SPSS, Excel, ...) but trying to respond to what they saw and what does not, in the latter is the case of Sigmund Freud (unconscious, libido, systematization and topography of the mind, ...).
or qualify for responding to a comment from my colleague and co-author: With respect to "irreversible consequences" to qualify something. Since the early age of the Little Albert a few conditioning sessions (Were not more than 10) do not imply the creation of a traumatic experience, and that babies are not the strongest experiences which the mark nearly a lifetime. No more early experiences are more stable but the most influential. is the case of some ill-treatment or malnutrition (although in this case, if there is continuous fall in the secular trend process if conditions improve.) Yes it is true that "the impact of a particular experience varies depending on the time course and characteristics of the subject" Development psychological and education, 1999 (Compilation J. Palacios, A. Marchesi and C. Coll)
cognitive intelligence Not long ago I read an article my colleague L. Collection Olviedo Hidalgo made on different types of intelligence . There are theories that postulate the existence of 8, other 10, and the most ancient postulates only one.
However, I would argue for the existence of one more, within any group or category, and cognitive intelligence. I'll explain with a simple example for all to perceptual (/ me) entendais
my view is a mosaic of several. Cognitive intelligence has some spatial intelligence, a little logic, intrapersonal and naturalist perhaps. It leads me to think that is a higher grade, or at least different from the others.
Examples cognitive intelligence are more practical purposes, say some criminologists at the crime scenes, the mathematical issues involved in "seemingly" without order or direction, the software in source code, surgeons and neurosurgeons, artists and other visionaries. 's not just to see what is known or giving perspectives, but have the ability to see / perceive aspects or points of view largely unexplored. For explain it more clearly (but fantastic) would be like having a sixth sense.
JB Watson and small Documentary Albert Sigmund Freud
butterfly I would be looking to your window. I wish I
petting daisy in the morning.
I be the wind That
goes through your face.
I want to be with you without feeling that I am.
so many things I would like you
Have fun in the world. That
world that feeds me in the morning beauty of hope
afternoon and evening so full of hope
with a song.
So many things make me live
But you would be better to live. . Diosaoasis: The beautiful nature inspires us to write many things about love.
